NetApp snapshots, offsite mirroring, NinjaOne Backup, Microsoft 365
Get written in-scope and out-of-scope coverage, named restore owners, and scheduled recovery tests you can show to auditors or insurers. We design around Veeam, Datto, NetApp where it fits, and Microsoft 365 protection on purpose, so backup, service desk, and security follow one incident thread when something fails.
A one time backup install with no operational handover, or a set and forget approach with no change records, access control, or restore testing cadence. If you need strategy only planning without operations backup scope, start with strategic managed service or a scoped project.
Data protection holds up when scope, security, and operations tell one story. Across 10,000+ managed endpoints, these controls reflect how we run managed IT in production.
NinjaOne backup for cloud and on prem estates, plus NetApp snapshots and offsite mirroring. Where continuity requirements suit Veeam or Datto patterns, we align those designs with cloud targets, sized to RPO/RTO, not generic nightly dumps.
Operations aligned to ISO 9001 style discipline, with security and privacy expectations framed in governance and continuity in the same management system as the rest of our delivery. We obtain independent assurance relating to our network designs, security services, and backup and recovery as part of our governance programme. For audit or insurance prep, the backup and recovery assessment gives you a dated, scoped review of where you stand today.
Service desk , NinjaOne , and managed security so restore and incident handoff use the same tickets, escalations, and facts, not a siloed backup admin nobody pages.
Australian MSP delivery with locations and model when buyers need to match data paths and support coverage to their own governance.
Use this checklist to compare providers on scope, immutability, restore testing, and audit evidence before your next review or renewal.
De identified patterns from real delivery work. Use these to pressure test what your current provider can evidence.
Before: Multiple teams were involved in restore decisions with no single owner for high priority workloads.
Outcome: A named restore owner model and escalation path were documented so service desk, security, and infrastructure teams followed one incident thread.
Before: Backup reporting looked healthy, but Microsoft 365 and selected SaaS datasets were not explicitly covered in policy.
Outcome: In scope and out of scope coverage was signed off in writing and aligned to retention and legal hold requirements before renewal.
Before: Restore tests were informal and difficult to present during insurer and board level reviews.
Outcome: Quarterly restore rehearsals were scheduled with dated artefacts, tracked exceptions, and runbook updates after each test.
Most failures are not tool failures. They are scope and process failures discovered during an outage, when Microsoft 365 was never protected, immutability was not enforced, or no one can run a full restore under pressure.
Reliable recovery is deliberately boring: fixed scope, rehearsed restore paths, and dated evidence that anyone can follow. If your next policy review or insurance attestation is already scheduled, ask for written scope and restore logs, not another dashboard screenshot.
Backup, recovery, and business continuity are trust issues for managed IT buyers. Boards, insurers, and auditors do not want marketing claims: they want clear proof, dates, and owners.
Green job ticks are not evidence. Proof means immutability and chain integrity you can explain, plus test restores that show data and applications coming back: not another dashboard screenshot alone. If your next audit or insurance renewal is close, book a focused backup and recovery assessment to surface real gaps before the reviewer does.
Leadership should see a calendar and artefacts, not someone’s memory. We run scheduled partial and full restores, log pass or fail, and update runbooks when a test surfaces a gap.
RTO and RPO belong in the runbook, not the brochure. We align targets to critical workloads, dependencies, and realistic paths: including Microsoft 365 and SaaS when they are in scope.
Priority order should be agreed before the incident. We help you define tier one systems, map application dependencies, and document who approved anything left out of the first wave.
Restores stall when ownership is vague. We document named restore owners, handoff between service desk , security , and infrastructure, and keep one ticket thread so escalations do not fragment under pressure.
Data protection works when scope is clear, backup copies are protected, and restores are tested. We run backup and DR as an operating practice with named ownership and repeatable proof.
NinjaOne backup across cloud and on prem workloads with image level and application consistent points, plus bare metal recovery paths for priority systems.
Datto continuity when you need fast virtualization or cloud failover, scoped with your network and identity so failover does not strand users on an island.
Tenant level coverage for Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams with retention and legal hold in mind, including journaling for email, SharePoint, and OneDrive where compliance requires. The Microsoft 365 recycle bin is not a backup plan.
Object lock capable storage, write once patterns, and separation of duties so ransomware cannot wipe your last good copy quietly. We design this with managed security so incident response and recovery use the same facts.
Written restore steps, tabletop exercises, and scheduled test restores with artefacts your risk committee can keep. Tie the rhythm to strategic reviews when leaders want recovery confidence alongside roadmaps.
Backup and DR run on the same platform as your service desk and infrastructure. Our management system ties quality, security, privacy, and continuity to daily operations and review cycles, not policy documents alone.
NinjaOne backup for cloud and on prem environments, NetApp snapshot and mirroring patterns, plus Veeam/Datto aligned continuity designs where they fit, with licensing and support consolidated through Trucell.
RPO/RTO, data classification, and cloud exit paths get agreed with your technical owners, not sold as a SKU list. We fit how you run Azure , on prem clusters, and Microsoft 365 in one picture.
Change records, access control, and review cadence line up with what enterprises expect when ISO 9001 or sector frameworks ask how you know backups actually work. Improvements get owners, like strategic managed service QBRs when you want leadership in the loop.
Service desk and NinjaOne context mean restore requests follow the same tickets and escalations your users already use.
Most tenders and risk reviews ask similar questions. Use these answer patterns as your starting point.
What to ask: what is explicitly in and out of backup, including M365, SaaS, and edge, with sign off on exclusions? How we answer: written scope before we size storage or licences, with exclusions named for leadership, not discovered at restore time.
What to ask: can an admin or attacker wipe the chain, and who holds separation of duties for backup accounts? How we answer: we design object lock and role separation with managed security so IR and recovery align on the same copy and the same playbooks.
What to ask: when did you last prove a full restore, and can you file artefacts? How we answer: test restores, drills, and table top outputs on a cadence matched to risk, with named owners and tracked gaps when a test fails, see also Essential Eight when recovery hygiene is in your control narrative.
What to ask: is tenant data protected to match retention and eDiscovery expectations? How we answer: we do not treat the recycle bin or short term Microsoft retention as a DR plan; we align SaaS protection to your M365 and identity story in writing.
What to ask: where do backups land, and does replication fight production bandwidth on the same network path without QoS or scheduling? How we answer: we align targets and schedules with cloud and network design so protection does not become the next outage source.
What to ask: which ticket queue runs restore, and who gets paged in a sev 1? How we answer: IT support and backup share escalation paths: users do not get a new mystery process when they need a file or VM back under pressure.
We review what you run now, what is in or out of scope, and the next restore worth proving. You leave with named owners and one practical gap to close first, no lock in.
Backup jobs can report success while recovery remains unproven. Use these checks before you sign or renew.
Can ransomware or admin error wipe the backup chain? If immutability is optional, treat it as a gap.
Databases and VMs need quiescing or VSS, snapshot only copies can break recovery for transactional workloads.
Named annual or quarterly tests with owners and runbook updates, not the first full restore during a crisis.
Four beats: decide what must survive, harden storage, prove recovery on a calendar, then run it like the rest of managed IT.
Inventory workloads, set RPO/RTO, handle regulatory retention, and list exclusions in writing before we size disk or licences.
Run test restores, failover drills, and ransomware style walkthroughs; keep evidence. Change the policy when the lab result disagrees with the diagram.
Monthly hygiene on capacity and alerts, plus annual or quarterly recovery tests sized to your risk, in step with security posture reporting when both teams need the same story.
You judge backup by tested restores and named owners, not by terabytes moved or job ticks alone.
Common due diligence questions before renewal, migration, or assurance review.
Scope should name included and excluded workloads, including Microsoft 365, SaaS, virtual machines, edge devices, and legacy applications. Exclusions should be documented and approved before licensing and storage sizing.
Restore testing should run on a scheduled cadence based on risk and criticality. Teams should keep evidence from full and partial restores, track failures, and update runbooks after each rehearsal.
Immutable storage helps prevent ransomware and privileged misuse from deleting or altering recovery points. It should be paired with role separation and incident ready procedures.
No. Native retention and recycle bins are not a complete backup strategy. Organisations should define tenant level Microsoft 365 backup coverage aligned to retention, legal hold, and recovery objectives.
Share a short backup brief and we will route your request with scope context. Best for teams comparing options before calendar scheduling.
Tell us your RPO and RTO, what platforms you run, and when a full restore was last proven in realistic conditions. We map scope gaps and recommend the next test worth running.
No obligation. Bring your current runbook, insurer requirements, or latest restore report.
Jump to an industry, partner, or service line; most Trucell clients touch more than one.
How we tune governance and service levels to sector risk, not generic SMB defaults.
Read moreClinical systems and imaging adjacent infrastructure where uptime and change control matter.
Read moreIdentity, endpoints, and backup patterns for firms handling sensitive client data.
Read moreData location, access, and retention aligned to how your practice actually works.
Read moreSites, mobile users, and head office, connectivity and collaboration without a brittle stack.
Read moreStarlink, Starlink multiplexing, fixed wireless, and enterprise WAN, integrated with security and operations for remote sites.
Read moreIdentity, endpoints, and safeguarding across campuses, labs, and hybrid learning.
Read moreStable operations and integrations for airlines, airports, and aviation services teams.
Read moreAgencies and emergency services, security baselines, governance, and field ready support.
Read more
Silver Partner stack for VoIP, UC, and contact centre, integrated with network, identity, and backup paths you actually operate.
Read more
Hybrid and multi cloud data paths: snapshots, replication, and performance matched to RPO/RTO talk.
Read moreEnterprise imaging and PACS/RIS integration depth for healthcare organisations balancing clinical outcomes and cybersecurity.
Read more
Operations visibility: patching, inventory, and reporting once workloads are live.
Read more
Next generation firewalls, SASE, and cloud security where your architecture standardises on Palo Alto.
Read more
Gold Partner stack for NGFW, SD WAN, ZTNA, and network security at the edge.
Read more
Singularity XDR for endpoint protection, deployed and tuned as part of managed security services.
Read more
AI assisted SIEM and SOC visibility, correlated alerts and reporting, not log storage alone.
Read more
Falcon telemetry and response where your estate standardises on CrowdStrike.
Read more
Managed detection for persistence, reseller led threats, and Microsoft 365 adjacent risk.
Read morePerimeter, endpoints, and monitoring sized to your risk profile.
Read moreAssess and implement mitigations aligned with the Australian Cyber Security Centre Essential Eight, with operations from Trucell IT support where you need it.
Read moreTenant hygiene, licensing clarity, and collaboration defaults before you scale users.
Read moreIn house development for APIs, integrations, and small applications, owned with your managed IT and change controls, not a disconnected vendor.
Read moreLAN, WAN, and Wi‑Fi that stay documented when the next project lands.
Read moreBusiness internet, WAN paths, and redundancy aligned to cloud and security design.
Read more3CX, Teams Voice, SIP, and recording paths integrated with network, identity, and backup.
Read moreCo managed IT options, TAM led roadmaps, and QBRs so IT spend, projects, and support stay on one thread.
Read moreServers, storage, and endpoints sourced with clear specs, resilience options, and lifecycle handover, not cart only buying.
Read moreService desk and steady state ops with clear triage and SLAs.
Read moreRadiology depth: uptime, DICOM and modality paths, PACS/RIS, storage, diagnostic displays, and vendor coordination: beyond desktop MSP defaults.
Read more
